Saturday, July 13, 2024

That close, on an unsecured rooftop?

 


25 comments:

  1. You know the saying that if you heard the shot, it wasn't aimed at you? The alternative is always that it was aimed at you but the shooter effed up. He might get it right next time. The video at "Check this out" at first had me thinking it was the shooter, not the secret service. If the secret service guy had missed, the shooter may have done more damage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very different sound when the muzzle is pointing right at you, and you hear the whizz, of the bullet, sounds like angry very fast bumblebee ripping past you, the muzzle sound is very flat, almost a diffused blatt instead if sharp crack. No mistaking it your the target.
      Aside that, again all these ambiguities, its clown world now, that means the rule of the lowest common denominator among those within that world, so many things which make no common sense are due to the peter principle in spades, then add any false flag stuff and nothing makes sense to R Strategists and high IQ and critical thinking people. Keep in our mind its critical, everything in clown world is about money and control control control, so nothing is happenstance on this order of things, makes one think, mmm, whats up now with all this? And always its multiple things, plan A, B, C and order out if chaos. Really this is the dependable factor.

      Delete
  2. The video seems to think that the SS sniper was watching the guy. Then reacts after the shooter takes his shot.
    From my take the sniper was scanning with his scope. He then raised his head in a, " WTF is that?" moment, after seeing the shooter on the roof. He then reacquires the target and starts engaging. That hesitation almost cost Trump his life. A better trained / more experienced sniper would have stayed on target and eliminated the threat before it became a problem.

    Leigh
    Whitehall, NY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SS should have been ON that roof.

      Delete
    2. Well the barrel never moves left to right, so...

      My take is he had him sighted, shoots him after Trump is hit, and then pulls up as he reacquires target to make sure he is dead and then pumps him with a few more.

      It looks to me like an inside job all the way.

      Delete
    3. I read somewhere (cannot confirm it's true) that the Secret Service sniper saw the shooter, called for permission to engage, and was denied at first. I would love to know if that's true and, if so, who refused permission.
      There's your inside job.
      ~ Doctor Weasel

      Delete
    4. 26 Minutes elapsed from Law enforcements last photo of the shooter in position until the attempt on Trumps life....IT IS an inside job.

      I don't give two shits what command says , I'm looking at a shooter lining up on my charge, I'm taking his stupid as out, screw command, screw protocol, let the courts decide my guilt or innocence in the matter!

      Delete
  3. Looks like 425 feet on Google Maps. Did I count 5 or 6 shots? In any case, it doesn't look like either of the two guys on the roof had a target when the shots happened. The prone man might have had a target, but he ducked immediately after firing which strikes me as weird.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Certainly unprofessional security

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't understand why the highest vantage point, the water tower, wasn't occupied. How many SS snipers were there? I would have thought much more than one.

    To me it looks like he's scanning, because when the shots start, he scrambles and targets a specific, different area. His backup next to him looks like he was ducking - not a good reaction for a SS sniper team, if so.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The twitchy beardygun twins wore Popo platecarriers. Anyone get a reasonable estimate on the wind conditions? First shot was a touch high and left; earlobe-philtrum is the alleged golden line. The stiff on the roof wore glasses. More info on his rifle and sights would be useful. Hope it isn't a mauser mutating into a carcano again. Who actually nailed him?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At under 150Y, wind is irrelevant unless it's a hurricane.
      Trump is no small target, and if this assclown was any kind of shooter, hitting minute of Trump should have left him ventilated by 3-8 shots.

      But this is worse than you thought:
      The shooter had to set up a 15' ladder to climb onto the roof in the first place.

      "Hur de dur, nothing to see here, just emo-fruitloop toting a war bag, AR-15, and a 15' ladder to the nearest tall building to the presidential front-runner's stage while he's speaking..."

      And the word is the local po-po counter-snipers waited 3 minutes with the guy in their sights for the SS to allow them to fire, and couldn't do so without the permission they never got until the guy opened fire.

      The head of the Secret Service must resign, and the head of that Secret Service protective detail should be fired for cause, and every other agent on it reassigned to looking for counterfeit bills in either Guam, or Pt. Barrow, AK for the next 5 years.

      Delete
    2. "if this assclown was any kind of shooter, hitting minute of Trump should have left him ventilated by 3-8 shots"
      I could have made that shot. I'm not much of a rifleman, to be honest. Iron sites, old milsurp rifle, under 200 yards, no problem. This guy was a crappy shooter. How the 'emo-fruitloop' got anywhere near there with a long rifle-looking thing is the question that needs answering.
      ~ Doctor Weasel

      Delete
  7. Perhaps he was trying to determine whether or not it was a raccoon or a shooter??? He obviously needs additional training as the drive thru attendant at McDonald’s…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 100 plus pound racoon wearing camo and carrying a rifle?.......remind me to stay away from your neck of the woods..

      Delete
  8. yup got out of his car, carrying a rifle, walked to the building, climbed up with rifle, and no one saw a thing until he was on the roof.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mark Dice has produced an intelligent video analysis.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh75C7zAbQo

    ReplyDelete
  10. In addition to as mentioned above, why no more than one SS sniper?, why no SS drone coverage??? And how in world were the buildings around the venue not locked down so that NO ONE could get to a roof top? Negligence?? You bethca. Consipiracy?? Mmm, maybe!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Peter, his eyes wide! Yes, of course, there's more than meets the eye.

      Delete
  11. The below comment was sent to me from a friend…


    Subject: Re: "Kill Trump" domains
    Yes. Months ago, in Naples while playing golf I met this great guy. He has a good friend who is a federal judge in NJ. He told me that judge said that the CIA was already planning to take out Trump and make it look like it was the fault of the Iranians for him taking out Soleimari. He would never serve another 4 years. I said bullshit. Well. here we are. I'll leave it up to you to draw your own conclusions.

    Of course, the “lone gunman” is dead and can’t talk. How convenient.

    The deep swamp disgusting assholes are alive and well. This is no “incident “.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I am really, really shocked! ... That they didn't try this years ago,

    ReplyDelete
  13. It looked to me as though the counter-sniper who was on his tripod was looking out over the crowd, and the counter-sniper who was on his belly was the one sighted in on the kid on the roof outside the security perimeter. The guy on the tripod came up off his sight when he heard the shots, and the guy on his belly did not shoot until the kid had already started shooting.

    The kid was in his sights before, during and after. This would mean he was under orders to let the kid do his worst before he took him out.

    Erik Prince posted the best assessment I've seen, based on the correct position of the kid on the roof. Everything yesterday -- except video of his corpse -- had him on the other side of the roof.

    https://x.com/realErikDPrince/status/1812538250931642534

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, especially when it came out that a cop saw him go up the ladder, and did not follow him after he pointed his weapon at the cop. They knew where he was.

      Delete
  14. It's a virtual certainty that this was NOT a "lone wolf" nut job. This kid had help and encouragement. Almost certainly from the CIA/FBI. Allowing the corrupt FBI to be the main "investigators" of this act is political insanity. All they will do is bury and hide relevant facts and evidence.

    ReplyDelete