Thursday, August 29, 2024

U.S. Coast Guard Has A Working Heavy Icebreaker Again

 About time.



The U.S. Coast Guard’s heavy icebreaker USCGC Polar Star has returned to its home port of Seattle, Washington, after a major service life-extending overhaul – and not a moment too soon. The medium icebreaker USCGC Healy, the service’s only other icebreaker available for operations in the Arctic and Antarctica, also sailed back into Seattle earlier this month after suffering a fire that forced its crew to abandon a planned deployment to the High North.



While Polar Star continues to be the world's most powerful non-nuclear icebreaker, it is also the only on in service capable of operating year round in Arctic and Antarctic waters.

Heavy icebreakers like Polar Star are “defined as ships that have icebreaking capability of 6 feet of ice continuously at 3 knots, and can back and ram through at least 20 feet of ice,” according to a report from the National Research Council of the National Academies. The medium icebreaker “Healy is designed to break 4.5 feet of ice continuously at three knots.

Elect me president and I'll have them build four more - the biggest they can.  We're the biggest economy in the world by far.  There's no reason there shouldn't be money for this

My website is "Elect CW President (joking here)"


15 comments:

  1. Starting the countdown until this 48 year old ship has another major propulsion failure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A new icebreaker?
    Why?
    With glow bull worming coming up we no longer need it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CORRECTION: "Man Caused Global Warming" - you've got to get it right or the libtards will discount your wisdom.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I read somewhere that before WW2, they were going to build icebreakers for use on the Great Lakes.
    They purposely built them larger than the locks could handle, to keep the US Navy from "requisitioning" them.
    Sure enough, during the war, here comes the Navy, saying "We'll take those, thank you very much.". The Navy was told "If you can get them out of here, you can have them.".
    Those icebreakers stayed in the Great Lakes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Russia has 40 including 4 nuclear and China has 4 . They own the Ice cap.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Actually, Russia has bigger, better...but nuke driven. They are the biggest economy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "They are the biggest economy"
      Care to explain based on what metric is it that you believe that Russia has the bigger economy?

      Our total GDP is 15-18 times larger. Our per capita GDP is 6 times larger. We produce more of everything, including oil, than Russia.

      The only thing that the Russian economy has more than the US is oligarchs, but some people are very diligently working to make sure we have just as many if not more oligarchs here.

      I know you hate the US. But don't lie to yourself and look at the real world.

      Delete
  7. joe says no deal.....

    ReplyDelete
  8. Actually, on a PPP basis the US has the third largest economy in the world, after China, and India. Russia is number 4. The US has negligible commercial ship-building capacity; China's is 700 times as large as ours. The Chinese make 75% of all the commercial shipping in the world each year (tonnage basis). Even Russia's ship-building capacity which is a distant 4th or 5th behind China, South Korea, and Japan, is very much larger than ours.

    Some US admiral suggested we buy our warships from South Korea. Maybe we can get our icebreakers from Russia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russia would sell us ice breakers, AFTER we came to our senses and stopped trying to overthrow them.

      Delete
    2. The HATE that some Americans have for America is staggering!
      The year is 2024 not 1954. Get your heads out of your asses.

      There is an argument to be made around the national security implications of having limited shipbuilding capability... There is also an argument to be made around the need for a Navy as large as ours in 2024.

      China's shipbuilding capacity is 200 times larger than the US'. 200 times larger is significantly larger. No need to lie and make it 700 times larger.
      China's shipbuilding industry is SUBSIDIZED by the GOVERNMENT and 100% CONTROLED by the government. Is that what you want? Do you want your tax dollars going to subsidize the cost of commercial ships for private companies so that we have capacity available in case some day, maybe we may need it? How much capacity is enough capacity?

      The US had a large shipbuilding capacity until the 80's. Our shipbuilding capacity was ALSO subsidized by the government. Reagan and the end of the cold war lead to the end of those subsidies.

      Ship building is a dirty, low wage industry. Most Americans don't want to do that job. Americans are free to decided to take jobs that pay better and are less dangerous. Most Americans want to live a happy life with their families. It is hard to live a happy life if you are forced into a job you don't want that pays low wages and has the potential to kill you on a daily basis.
      Chinese workers don't have the FREEDOM to choose what job to take or not. In many cases they don't have the FREEDOM to move to a better paying job. To a large extent Chinese kids are raised by grandparents because parents are working 1345 hours a week just to be able to feed their families.

      I thought you were for freedom, free economy and the pursuit of happiness! Are you arguing that some Americans should do this dirty, low paying job?

      By the way. We have allies. Allies are important in case of war because they can help us in case of need. When people argue for scrapping NATO they are arguing for making us weaker in the global stage. If WW3 that many fantasize were to happen there is no scenario that would not include us. If WW3 comes and we had scrapped NATO, where do you suggest we could repair our ships that were damaged far from our ports. Would Korea, Japan, Australia, Germany, etc. open their ports to aid our sailors once we turned our backs on them?

      Make up your minds people!
      If we will scrap NATO, turn our backs on our allies, retreat to our shores, build walls and hunker down in the homeland... Then there is no NEED for a Navy. Bulk up the Coastguard and we are good to go. No need for icebreakers, aircraft carriers and submarines. Who gives a shit about shipbuilding capacity if we will turn our backs on the world.

      Some people are too stupid to be able to see the big picture...

      Delete
    3. Now you're making sense! Scrap NATO and the UN! Turn our backs on the rest of the world (that hates us anyway)! Retreat to our own shores! Build a wall and most importantly stop being the "Policeman of the World"!!! The compulsive and inexperienced idiots running this once-great nation have lost sight of "America First!"

      Delete
  9. I re-piped the pony boiler on that thing back in the early 90s. Nice boat.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Take away 90% of the DEI budget for the Navy and the Air Farce, and give it all instead to the Coasties for ships and maintenance, and whom will actually do something worthwhile with the funds.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Enjoyed some time on uscg river tugs converted into ice breaks. Cool stuff.

    ReplyDelete