Tuesday, August 1, 2023

Any Comments?

 


74 comments:

  1. When she's sixty or seventy, she will regret it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She will look like that rotten piece of fruit in your fridge.

      Delete
  2. i'm betting this 'un will light up the comments as the day goes on. personally i don't like tatts. it is up to the individual if it aint affecting me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well ain't you special.

      Delete
    2. I don't like them either. I don't understand why anyone would do something like this to their body......'cept, drugs.....LSD maybe.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. Why get a tattoo that looks like grandmas Sunday dress?

      Delete
  4. Remember Tattoo the movie with Bruce Dern and Maud Adams, People may not like them.. some use tattoos to tell a story or remember a loved one, with the right artist a tattoo can be a masterful work of art or a joke, do your research before getting inked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That much sub cutaneous ink cannot be healthy....

      Delete
    2. That was the first movie, that I remember, with a tat that large. As I remember that dragon went down her whole side and leg. It was against
      her will but looked good in the end.

      Delete
  5. Wasn't there a time when circus sideshows had the tattooed ladies?

    Like the third anon says, it's her choice and her life, but that much ink says "sideshow freak" to me. FN.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. sideshows, also called freakshows were banned by the left.
      And now we all know why.

      Delete
    2. Because the left took over the term "freak show".

      Delete
    3. Wasn't there a time when circus sideshows had the fat lady ("ladies")?

      Delete
  6. What a waste of what probably was some nice real estate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Looks like she was a pretty woman before she decided to vandalize herself. Pity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That’s a sad desecration of a thing of beauty. Like graffiti on a Van Gogh

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm guessing she's Japanese, and it's a more accepted thing culturally for her. The Japanese have some incredibly artistic tattooing, though I don't understand exactly where it falls in their culture ... is it widely accepted, or more a niche thing among a more select group.

    I can appreciate the artistic-ness of her tatto, but have to agree that she would be more beautiful without, or with much less. But that's just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, tattoos are not common not readily accepted in Japan. While working there, a friend of mine had to get permission from the hotel owner to use the public bath due to his tattoos.

      Delete
    2. In Japan, associated only with the criminal class. Once, having a tattoo was an automatic death sentence.

      Delete
  10. ALL the attention isn't enough for some people. She looks like a walking comic book.

    ReplyDelete
  11. She's another one that has destroyed the union local 4 representing Circus Tattooed ladies. Dylan Mulvaney did a similar thing to union local 5 representing Circus Bearded ladies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. With that much tattoo coverage, I'm guessing her breasts are inked as well. That would be painful . Overall, it's cool looking at first glance but in reality just creepy and gives me the shivers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I've thought a lot about why people cover themselves in tattoos. I believe the reason is simply that they don't know what to do with their freedom. They know they're free and they know that freedom is a good thing. They just don't know what to do with it, so they do this so as to have done 'something' with it.

    Anyways, that's my theory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that. And some do for the adrenaline and/or for rebellion.

      Delete
  14. Ink sucks (still and again)! That is all!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Y'all do what you want, but I never saw anyone who looked BETTER with a tattoo than without it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not with a Ten Foot Pole.

    ReplyDelete
  17. there is a lovely young lass with a fine narrow ass at the restaurant where I will get breakfast in half an hour. complete charmer, with a smile that makes you go "aaawwww". covered in low quality pointless tattoos. two red Xs, the letters DVD, various dates, no pattern, no blending. I think she's addicted to the needle, not the ink.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your needle addiction comment. You put your finger on it right there, straight on and without deflection.

      Delete
  18. Art belongs on inanimate objects, not human skin.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I wonder how many times shes been treated for hepatitis?
    MrHappy

    ReplyDelete
  20. At 60, she'll look like a Rorschach test ink spot.

    ReplyDelete
  21. How can she tell when she has a rash?

    Anyway.... guessing she's not a virgin.

    ReplyDelete
  22. https://0ddskull.tumblr.com/post/148863829725/not-done-by-me-now-forever-on-my-leg-grrrls-to

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why does she were clothing? No one would know if she was naked or not.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Wedding or Execution ? We Report - You Decide !!

    ReplyDelete
  25. In my day only sailors and whores got tattooed. I've never gotten over that and I don't like ink.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Guess what??? It’s not your day anymore… Different time now…

      Delete
    2. Your time will be short. Stupid doesn't last long.

      Delete
  26. I'm so old that I remember tats being for sailors & crooks. For sailors, the tradition had a purpose (identifying the body after it was submerged for a while); for the crooks it was a permanent branding of membership. Though I did get one small tat (while intoxicated, young and in the Navy), it is small and rarely visible. I'm not a fan of ink, particularly on women or very visible (e.g. face/neck).

    ReplyDelete
  27. Tattoos: self abuse that lasts a lifetime.

    ReplyDelete
  28. In for a penny, in for a hundred pound
    Does nothing for me

    ReplyDelete
  29. Somewhere in the world someone will always do a stupid thing for a stupid reason. Now we have the Internet to let everyone else know.

    ReplyDelete
  30. She probably was sexually abused as a child to have such self loathing manifested by self abuse. Poor girl.

    ReplyDelete
  31. That's one ugly ass MoFo.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Self graffiti. I am unable to understand why a person would deface their body like that. Would you buy a car then bring it home and spray it with graffiti? Then why do that to your body?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Is the circus in town?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Clearly, a head case. Avoid at all costs!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Lydia oh Lydia have you met Lydia
    Lydia the tattooed lady - sung by Groucho Marx canna recall movie…

    Had an uncle in merchant marine wwii - just say no to ink - doesn’t age well.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Could it possibly be a body suit or temporary stick ons like they use in movies?

    ReplyDelete
  37. One of the first signs of a civilization in decline is graffiti.
    Both public and private.
    It is an indicator of the loss of respect or reverence for true beauty.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think it a body suit too, look at the wrinkles on her neck.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I've never seen a woman that's looks were improved by a tattoo or piercing.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Each to their own. Not for me but if she likes them then that's her business and no one else's. All the same, I'd like to closely review every inch!

    ReplyDelete
  41. tats... a permanent "solution" to a temporary problem.

    ReplyDelete
  42. That's Yakuza Gangsign, and, Severe. She is either a "Mafia Princess" or a Gangster's Pet.
    The Inks are not Petro-Chemical Based. They will not Fade or cause Cancer.
    All you Critics - Judge Not, lest you be Judged.
    Do Not Mock a Culture you Do Not Understand.

    She would be a better Wife than any of the Fat Pigs that Waddle around in the FUSSA.

    ReplyDelete
  43. The artist was a good one but I greatly dislike the end result. Yakuza notwithstanding.

    ReplyDelete