Thursday, September 14, 2023

The Science is Never Settled

 By  Sergei I. Sikorsky

Few technologies have had such a rapid development and such a powerful impact on mankind as the invention of the airplane. Also, few new technologies were greeted with such enthusiasm by the general public and by such skepticism by the scientific community. It is enough to recall the comments of a noted New York newspaper after the crash of Professor Langley’s “Aerodrome” into the Potomac River. In its editorial of October 9th, 1903, the newspaper sharply criticized Professor Langley and the Smithsonian Institution for wasting taxpayer money on the experiment. It concluded by asserting that it will take between one and ten million years of research before a flying machine will be developed. Less than two months later, the Wright brothers flew at Kitty Hawk. In mid-December of 1903, a few wire services hesitantly carried the news of the flights. Another major newspaper commented as follows “…When a reputable scientist can prove with irrefutable logic that man cannot fly, why should the public be fooled by silly stories about two bicycle repairmen who haven’t even been to college?”

As the son of aviation pioneer Igor Sikorsky, I listened, fascinated, by his description of aviation in the early days of 1910-1912. There were plenty of scientific “naysayers,” even after the airplane had become a reality. One of the prevailing “facts” was that there was an upper limit to the maximum weight of an aircraft of about 2,000 pounds. After all, nature proved it by the fact that the ostrich was the heaviest bird on earth, but it could not fly. With obvious satisfaction, my father would relate what a storm of scientific criticism greeted his proposal to build a four-engined, 8,000-pound gross weight aircraft. At the ripe old age of 24 years, he was going against the prevailing opinion of some of Europe’s most respected aviation authorities, for whom the “one ton law” was indisputable. Despite many sleepless nights while he checked and rechecked his calculations, the “Grand” was finally ready for flight in the spring of 1913. With Igor Sikorsky at the controls, the “Grand” lifted into the air and flew into aviation history as the world’s first four-engined aircraft to fly successfully.

Its innovations included a fully enclosed flight deck for two pilots and a comfortable cabin with room for up to eight passengers. The secret to its success was Igor Sikorsky’s intuitive insistence on a high aspect ratio wing of 12:1, despite the weight and drag penalties. This “intuitive engineering,” as my father defined it, would help him solve many challenges during his career. The aspect ratio factor is remarkable, since my research shows that wing area, and airfoil theory were being slowly understood by 1912, but the importance of aspect ratio was largely unappreciated. Another aspect of the “Grand” worthy of note is that this large, four-motored “airliner” established a number of records, including carrying eight passengers over St. Petersburg, Russia, during a flight that lasted just over two hours. All this, just nine-and-a-half years after the Wright brothers first flew at Kitty Hawk!

As I grew older, I clearly remember questioning my father about new scientific impossibilities then regarded as absolute barriers. In the late 1930s and early 1940s these barriers included: A maximum speed of some 400-450mph would be reached by research aircraft, but the average civil and military aircraft would remain at 250-300mph due to engine and propeller limitations. The (then) aviation authority, the CAA, had an arbitrary landing speed limit of no higher than 65mph for civil transports in the mid-1930s, since it was the opinion of the experts that the average airline pilot could not safely cope with higher landing speeds. Commercial airliners would probably operate at 10,000 to 12,000 feet altitude since higher cruising altitudes would require some form of pressurization with unacceptable weight penalties. And every aviation expert knew how rapidly piston engines and propellers lost power at altitudes above 25,000 feet, making supersonic flight an impossible dream.
Igor Sikorsky did not believe in those barriers. He remained an “intuitive engineer.” In January of 1930, a long-gone newspaper, the New York Telegram, published a series of interviews asking various New Yorkers to guess what New York would be like some 50 years in the future, i.e. in 1980. Among them was Igor Sikorsky. In that interview, he made a number of uncannily accurate predictions. Among them were the following:

New York would be a major aviation hub, with airliners departing for the far corners of the world. The airliners would be giant, all-metal aircraft “carrying hundreds of passengers. Travel would be comfortable and the passengers will feel as if the craft were entirely motionless. In the heated and nicely arranged interior the rooms of the ship will be kept at a constant atmospheric pressure of say, two-thirds that of ground level. There will be no air pockets (as turbulence was called in 1930) and no motion will be felt except for a slight vibration given by extremely powerful motors, or rather turbines!” Flight times between Europe and New York would be six to eight hours.

This is pretty heavy technical prediction, when one considers that it was made some three years before the advent of the Douglas DC-3. Being an optimist, Igor Sikorsky never imagined the arrival of the coach class or economy seat.

Fortunately, his vision of aviation was shared by a small number of talented designers. In the late 1930s, the turbine and the liquid-fueled rocket engine were developed. Perfected in the last days of World War II, they forever changed the post-war world. Some changes went almost unnoticed. Sometime in December of 1951, airline passenger-miles topped railroad Pullman passenger miles in America, 10.6 million to 10.2 million. In December, 1958, more people (1.2 million) crossed the Atlantic by air than by ocean liner. In 1961, Russia startled the world when Yuri Gagarin first orbited the earth. Then, in 1969, Neil Armstrong walked on the moon and another “impossible” achievement became a reality.

As a child, Igor Sikorsky was told that man would never fly. He lived to become an aviation legend in his own right and to meet the first man to walk on the moon. He gave me the following advice:

“In aviation and science, use the word impossible with the greatest of caution.”

Thanks RHT 447!

11 comments:

  1. My pleasure. Glad you enjoyed it. I have been an aviation buff since I could first read. My dad was a B-17 pilot with this group--

    http://www.447bg.com/

    He flew 35 combat missions over Europe. He also loved the game of Poker. Flew his final mission in a ship named "Royal Flush".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What the hell, as long as I'm on a roll. And yeah, guess where I got my screen name.

      This is my Dad’s AT-6 story.
      It is the fall of 1945, and the war is over. My dad has returned to CONUS from England after his combat tour flying 35 missions as a B-17 pilot with the 447th Bomb Group. He is stationed in San Diego, and has been tasked with transferring some number of AT-6’s from there up to Oakland. Suffice it to say that he is now an “old hand”. He has this down pat.

      Stretch out pre-flight, paperwork, whatever through Monday into Tuesday until it is too late to make the flight. Make flight Wednesday, stop in Fresno for fuel, arrive Oakland late afternoon. Spend Thursday with post-flight, paperwork, whatever. Now no point in catching a train to RTB because it will be the weekend. Spend Friday and Saturday at his folk’s place where he grew up, catch a train for San Diego on Sunday. Rinse, lather, repeat.

      One fine day, a freshly minted infantry 2Lt. asks my dad if he can get a ride. “Sure thing” says my dad. Tells 2Lt when to report to the field and to check out a chute. They head out at the appointed time and land in Fresno for fuel, the off again to Oakland. They are cruising north, snowy mountains far to the east, blue pacific far to the west. Life is good. But, a little bumpy. So my dad requests, and is cleared for an altitude change, which smooths out the ride.

      About the time my dad’s watch tells him he is arriving, he checks his landmarks. Yup, there’s the mountain, there’s the bridge over the bay, there’s ….wait, whut?

      Oops, that’s not Mt. Hamilton, that’s Mt. Diablo, and that’s not the Dumbarton bridge, that’s the San Francisco Bay Bridge. You see, at the Fresno fuel stop, he neglected to check the pilot report board, and so was unaware that his altitude change also gave him a tail wind. He has flown past the airport. As I mentioned, the war just ended, and folks are still a bit jumpy about un-accounted for aircraft in the sky. If you arrive too far outside your ETA, you will fill out stacks of forms explaining WHY you arrived outside your ETA.

      They are at about 7000 ft. My dad contacts Oakland control and says he is about to enter the pattern. He tells his passenger to tighten his straps and hang on. He then rolls the plane on its back and executes a screaming split-S to lower altitude, enters the pattern, lands, taxis to the ramp, and shuts down. He steps out on the wing, and checks on his passenger. The 2Lt. is green, and has possibly wet himself. He struggles to exit the cockpit, and in the process, snags the release for his parachute, which deploys over the tail of the plane. He makes a feeble effort to gather the chute, gives up and hits the release, and is last seen desperately running for a place to heave his cookies.

      Delete
    2. RHT447 - heard a similar family story. Fighter pilot mustered out after WWII. Worked until he could afford to get his own acrobatic rated plane. Was running one leg alongside an airport where he was preparing to land when the control tower radioed that a commercial plane was approaching, had priority, and he was to cut the current leg short and loop around to land after the commercial plane landed. Doing so had him going over the runway when another call from the control tower said he was clear to land if he did it immediately. So he stood the plane on its wing, spun it 90 degrees, and pancaked in for a landing...followed by a spluttering voice from the control tower "Y-y-you d-d-d-didn't??!!!"

      Delete
  2. The two bicycle shop owners first got the aeronautical bug by way of the Smithsonian. Wilbur had written (May 30, 1890) to the Smithsonian to request information on experiments for man to fly. The Smithsonian replied with the research of Lilienthal, Octave Chanute, James Mean, Mouillard, and Langley.
    (Thirteen years after that letter, Wilbur would breathe his last, a victim of Typhoid.)

    The governing board of the Smithsonian Institute gave Langley credit for the first airplane to fly under its own power. (Langley was one of their own and he enjoyed their lavish support plus that of fedgov. Thereby Langley's steam powered model aircraft were held to such esteem. The War Dept had awarded $50,000 to Langley. That effort became known as Langley's Folly after the infamous flop into the Potomac.)

    This so incensed the Wrights that they refused their first aircraft to be displayed in the U.S.. They sent it the British Museum until the Smithsonian recanted.

    One reason the Wrights went to Kitty Hawk was to escape the ridicule from the media. It was as if a national game to find humorous anecdotes in the endeavors of the Wrights. Newspapers would assign reporters to follow the Wrights to then report back and write articles mocking the Wrights. One such reporter, Ora L James, was sent to Kitty Hawk by his editor. The Wrights grew weary of his mockery and incessant questioning. They threatened him with bodily harm.

    The first flight of Sikorsky's helicopter which was not a test flight was to rescue a mariner in danger on Long Island Sound during a storm.

    The Wrights never claimed to be the first. Their claim ever was only controllable powered flight. Until the Wrights, turns & banks, ascents and descents were not controllable except hazardly by weight shift.

    "I wish to avail myself of all that is already known and then if possible add my mite to help on the future worker who will attain final success."
    --Wilbur Wright

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My comment about Sikorsky is because after critics finally came to accept that the helicopter did work as designed, they then questioned its practical use. The rescue rendered the critics mute.

      Delete
  3. Yes, thank you, RHT 447. And BTW, the http://www.447bg.com website is fantastic. I've seen you post that link before and every time you do I spend some time reading. But it's so voluminous I don't know if a guy could ever read it all.

    As to the Sikorsky story, I'm a huge fan-boy of the S-64 E/Fs, as flown by Erickson. I'm a retired logger who lives very near where Erickson originally operated so I've watched them fly for well over 40 years now. Even though Jack Erickson sold the company I can't help but wonder what Igor would think about some of the trick tools used by the Sky Crane that were invented by the people who worked with Jack. I've got to believe he'd be proud of what Jack has been able to accomplish with his invention.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, Elmo. I recall you commenting before. Glad to have you along. Here's another class III time sink. Pour yourself another cup.

      https://447bg.smugmug.com/

      The site seems to go through occasional bumps and grinds. The controls are now a bit more user friendly, but the loading lists for 1945 only have the first day for each month. Hopefully that will be fixed.

      Heard this Flying Crane story decades ago. Took place somewhere in the south east USA. IIRC, a ship was ferrying empty from point A to point B. Because of the unique weather conditions that day, the crew got a wild hair and decided to go for max altitude, and got up some insane height. Other traffic was slightly agog when informed by ATC to watch for rotary wing traffic at their 9 O'clock.

      Delete
    2. That had to have been a long time ago. Those guys take zero unnecessary chances these days. That's why they're safety record is so fantastic.
      The last time I can think of when one went down was almost 30 years ago and it happened about 30 miles from my house. It was a Siller Brothers ship and when it happened it didn't surprise me that it wasn't one of Erickson's. Those guys have always been complete pros and are serious as a heart attack. Class acts, much like Jack himself.

      Delete
  4. Sort of related, a recommended book to learn about the early history and development of aviation is "I should never be so lucky again", autobiography of Jimmy Doolittle. While he is mostly know for the "30 seconds over Tokyo" raid, he was right there from just about the beginning of aviation through WW2 and beyond.

    ReplyDelete