Thursday, December 10, 2020

Stubby

 


20 comments:

  1. Whoa. Now I LIKES that! Can you imagine the work it took to make that possible? I'm not seeing how that drivers door works.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the craftsmanship is so fine, even the door seams all but disappear.
      it would make a great matchbox collectible.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. Me likes, too. But are we sure this isn't a photoshop? No door seam, the driver would be sitting on the fender liner, and I'm not seeing much leg room. The skull logo on the utility box looks superimposed as well.

    Reminds me of the little Japanese RHD I had for a while, but more radical.

    /DW

    ReplyDelete
  3. I vote for photo-chop, too!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Think 350 V-8, transmission, transfer case. Negative length driveshaft? Photo shop gets my vote, but a clever one. The skull & crossbones looks too sharp, too, against the photo resolution. If it's not photoshop, the driveshaft must be all slip-joint.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here's the real truck. https://www.dupontregistry.com/autos/listing/1972/chevrolet/k10/2369021

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is pretty cool. I would buy that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Be a fun ride on black ice!

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is still do-able. Chevy van front sheet metal with matching year pickup truck rear cab sheet metal. Mate the front and back sheets and you could come up with this! Put it back on the van frame so engine, etc. matches up and church up a rear pickup bed to fit.
    That would be an outstanding one-off setup!

    irontomflint

    ReplyDelete
  9. First glance was that it might be a weird unimog with a Chevy body grafted, but it is a photoshop as there are no offset geared hubs showing and all the other little details as mentioned, no door hinges etc. Fun idea, Jeep cab over already did it back in the late 50's.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Original Image at https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/123686491_1592270567641741_1571919278750267579_o.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=2&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=-44LjiJsh50AX-TTja_&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=50d5b3b14ff63ab9ea2bb5b129198b76&oe=5FF8AFEC

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah, no. I owned a 72 short-wide 4x4 for quite a while and one lookit told me that's a big fat nope.

    ReplyDelete
  12. looks like a Blazer front end turned into a cabover. doesnt look like there is enough room for everything though

    ReplyDelete
  13. Looks like an Americanized old-school VW to me.

    ReplyDelete