And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Lot of people believe it was all staged. Some say the moon is an artifact, the real moon destroyed in a war 250,000 years ago, and why Noa's Ark, as when the moon was lost all heck broke loose and screwed up the weather, and what they call Source, (God it seems), had some human's collect every sort of fauna in a huge space ship. Not saying I believe or not in that take, but its sure interesting speculation, particularly today, as its looking an awful lot like everything we been told to believe, or believe in is a lie, even Einstein, accused of having stolen MC squared from another theorist. Read another interesting tidbit, how MC2 no longer fits the model of relativity, its we are now in a universe that creates only with the light and it’s based on the V (velocity), and E (energy), and T (time which is really distance), which equals M (matter)"
The only truth allowed fits with what (((They))) want us to believe. (((They/Them))), code for Commie, jooo, Satanic, pedo, ultra rich/powerful, on/off world, top management. It's a big club, with the lower end, being loosely affiliated yet competing factions. The closer to the top you get, the less counter opinions are tolerated. Your opinion/belief system, may vary. Indicating you're probably not in the club.
I'm with you on the whole affair. I was told it was true growing up, saw all sorts of video and photographic evidence to support it. Then the internet came out, and all these sleuths started digging.... and I don't blindly trust strangers off the internet anymore than I do the media (at this point, as you say, how many things have we been lied to?), but watching some of those video's they point out, the moon-deniers, it's hard to dispute what they're saying. Have you seen the photo's of the mars-practice surface NASA used in California or Nevada, superimposed on-top of the "mars rover" photo's? I mean, there's close, and then there's a dead match. Some of them are a dead match. WTF? The "Why Files" guy had an episode recently says we went to mars w/ the russians 50+ years ago. Is it true? Dunno... .... it should come as no surprise. Times like this I reflect back to Copernicus. Just some math dude fiddling away who noticed "this math doesn't work"... so he busted and figured, and came up w/ a theory that was different as could be. WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE EARTH REVOLVES AROUND THE SUN?! ARE YOU DAFT?! We KNEW, we were absolutely certain he was wrong, because all of the authority figures of the time said so. We KNOW the internet tin-foil hat weirdo's are wrong, because all of the authority figures of this time said so. I honestly question whether water is wet at this point. Which frankly is the point. They want us confused and unsure of which way is up, we're easier to control when in that state.
I love the no stars bit: that's photography 101, one of the first lessons. If you were out there, the sun is as bright as being on beach at midday. YOU couldn't see the stars, why do you think the film can record them? As for rover tracks, what do you expect them to look like when viewed nearly edge on?
Footprints. The photo's of the footprints that are on the moon, don't match the soles of the boots on the EVA suit on display in the Smithsonian. Did he slip on some rubbers when he left the capsule?
The dust is another big issue. We used a rocket engine to land this thing on the surface, yes? Orbited a spell, then dropped down to it, and whooosh, used a rocket to slow the descent and just gently touch down. How did all the dust not get blown away by the engine? How could there be enough dust near the base of the lander's ladder, to record a footprint, if a rocket engine was just firing just a few feet away?
We have a really nice video of the lander leaving the surface of the moon and going back into lunar orbit. Poof goes the rocket, up it flies, camera pans and follows it. Who was shooting the video?
Don't even get me started on all the wackiness in space-shuttle video's and crap from the space station.
We got to ride on one of the early rover's as cub scouts in Flagstaff in the 1960's. Who's of thought? (Shoemaker, of Shoemaker-Levy comet fame, was our scout leader).
If NASA made it to the moon, then why do they "need to build a rocket to reach the moon" ?? Why not upgrade the one they already used. It's all bullshit. And, if they did make to the moon they would either be mining the heck out of or building a military base. Just sayin'.
How demoralized must we be as a country to believe the 'fake moon landing' nonsense?
You do realize we were in a race with at that time with the only other super power? You think they just threw up their arms and took our word for it?
Russia confirmed it and stopped their moon program.
By the way, takes about two seconds to google India's photographs of the lunar module bases still left on the moon. The lower part of the LEM serves as a launch platform for the crew section allowing it to launch back into the moon's orbit to rendezvous with the command module for its return to earth.
The bases are still there right where we left them. Get another grift, this song is old, tired and stupid.
More excellent photos and some archived first hand details here: The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/main.html
Lot of people believe it was all staged. Some say the moon is an artifact, the real moon destroyed in a war 250,000 years ago, and why Noa's Ark, as when the moon was lost all heck broke loose and screwed up the weather, and what they call Source, (God it seems), had some human's collect every sort of fauna in a huge space ship.
ReplyDeleteNot saying I believe or not in that take, but its sure interesting speculation, particularly today, as its looking an awful lot like everything we been told to believe, or believe in is a lie, even Einstein, accused of having stolen MC squared from another theorist. Read another interesting tidbit, how MC2 no longer fits the model of relativity, its we are now in a universe that creates only with the light and it’s based on the V (velocity), and E (energy), and T (time which is really distance), which equals M (matter)"
V+E over T ='s M
(as per Source)
Interesting more and more.
The only truth allowed fits with what (((They))) want us to believe.
Delete(((They/Them))), code for Commie, jooo, Satanic, pedo, ultra rich/powerful, on/off world, top management. It's a big club, with the lower end, being loosely affiliated yet competing factions. The closer to the top you get, the less counter opinions are tolerated.
Your opinion/belief system, may vary. Indicating you're probably not in the club.
I'm with you on the whole affair. I was told it was true growing up, saw all sorts of video and photographic evidence to support it. Then the internet came out, and all these sleuths started digging.... and I don't blindly trust strangers off the internet anymore than I do the media (at this point, as you say, how many things have we been lied to?), but watching some of those video's they point out, the moon-deniers, it's hard to dispute what they're saying.
DeleteHave you seen the photo's of the mars-practice surface NASA used in California or Nevada, superimposed on-top of the "mars rover" photo's? I mean, there's close, and then there's a dead match. Some of them are a dead match. WTF?
The "Why Files" guy had an episode recently says we went to mars w/ the russians 50+ years ago. Is it true? Dunno...
.... it should come as no surprise. Times like this I reflect back to Copernicus. Just some math dude fiddling away who noticed "this math doesn't work"... so he busted and figured, and came up w/ a theory that was different as could be. WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE EARTH REVOLVES AROUND THE SUN?! ARE YOU DAFT?!
We KNEW, we were absolutely certain he was wrong, because all of the authority figures of the time said so.
We KNOW the internet tin-foil hat weirdo's are wrong, because all of the authority figures of this time said so.
I honestly question whether water is wet at this point. Which frankly is the point. They want us confused and unsure of which way is up, we're easier to control when in that state.
No stars, and no lunar rover tracks.
ReplyDeleteMy cousin was on the USS Hornet for the Apollo 12 recovery. If it was all fake, they sure went to a lot of trouble with a billion details.
DeleteI love the no stars bit: that's photography 101, one of the first lessons. If you were out there, the sun is as bright as being on beach at midday. YOU couldn't see the stars, why do you think the film can record them? As for rover tracks, what do you expect them to look like when viewed nearly edge on?
DeleteI see tracks, but they don’t make any sense.
DeleteFootprints.
DeleteThe photo's of the footprints that are on the moon, don't match the soles of the boots on the EVA suit on display in the Smithsonian. Did he slip on some rubbers when he left the capsule?
The dust is another big issue. We used a rocket engine to land this thing on the surface, yes? Orbited a spell, then dropped down to it, and whooosh, used a rocket to slow the descent and just gently touch down.
How did all the dust not get blown away by the engine? How could there be enough dust near the base of the lander's ladder, to record a footprint, if a rocket engine was just firing just a few feet away?
We have a really nice video of the lander leaving the surface of the moon and going back into lunar orbit. Poof goes the rocket, up it flies, camera pans and follows it. Who was shooting the video?
Don't even get me started on all the wackiness in space-shuttle video's and crap from the space station.
The Kubrick set.
ReplyDeleteWe got to ride on one of the early rover's as cub scouts in Flagstaff in the 1960's. Who's of thought? (Shoemaker, of Shoemaker-Levy comet fame, was our scout leader).
ReplyDeleteIf NASA made it to the moon, then why do they "need to build a rocket to reach the moon" ?? Why not upgrade the one they already used. It's all bullshit. And, if they did make to the moon they would either be mining the heck out of or building a military base. Just sayin'.
ReplyDeleteThere is also, that little detail of believing aluminum and thin stainless steel is going to save yer ass from the lethal radiation.
ReplyDeleteHow demoralized must we be as a country to believe the 'fake moon landing' nonsense?
ReplyDeleteYou do realize we were in a race with at that time with the only other super power? You think they just threw up their arms and took our word for it?
Russia confirmed it and stopped their moon program.
By the way, takes about two seconds to google India's photographs of the lunar module bases still left on the moon. The lower part of the LEM serves as a launch platform for the crew section allowing it to launch back into the moon's orbit to rendezvous with the command module for its return to earth.
The bases are still there right where we left them. Get another grift, this song is old, tired and stupid.
Who's doing the new production? Is it Spielberg or someone else?
ReplyDeleteDaytime temp. 250F°. I'm sure the cooling system in his suit will keep him cool, no problem.
ReplyDeleteHow to tell us You Know Nothing About Space Suits without telling us you know nothing about space suits.
DeleteYou heard, maybe once, that we routinely build suits that keep guys cool on earth against ambient temps of 500° F. to 1500° F., for prolonged periods?
That you can buy retail?