And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
And the limp-wrist, hysterical libtards keep screaming, "The End of the World is Near!" while scumbags like Al "the bore" Gore become millionaires and as Congress throws trillions of good monies after bad trying the change the weather.
In my mind, "change the weather" people are simply in seek of being recognized as divine beings. All that's missing is their designation of someone as g_d.
I am old enough to remember in the 1970s when ALL of the "experts" were predicting that the next Ice Age was almost upon us! Hmmm, I wonder how that prediction turned out!? Also, I live in Michigan, a state that was formed when thousands of years ago, the earth cooled and great glaciers were formed that scraped away much land, forming the Great Lakes. But then the earth warmed up again and those glaciers went away. I challenge anyone who believes in the idiotic "climate change" agenda how that happened. I mention to them that there weren't any SUVs belching exhaust into the air, nor were there any factories polluting the air. In fact, there weren't that many humans around in the entire world at that time. So I tell them if they can't answer how the Great Lakes were formed by the earth cooling and warming again, that they don't know that they are talking about! --Rusty
It seems to me that at one time, Europe, Asia, and almost all of North America was covered by ice. Some it over a mile thick. Almost no people, no industry, no cars, no oil powered anything and it all melted. Gee, imagine that.
All I can say is that these "scientists" should abase themselves in front of all real scientists and apologize profusely for being so lazy and stupid. WATER VAPOR does hundreds of times more infrared forcing than CO2, and anybody who knows anything at all about chemistry and the environmental systems knows that "CO2 Warming" is a complete crock of scheiss.
Truly nice enlightened progressives. Both where comintern trained operatives, went on foreign "cultural/agrarian seminars", (boot camp for western marxist agents), during their college years, in Cuba and Soviet Russia, this actors co-partner, (co-author for their famous Whole Earth book), was truly into green methods, he was tried for homicide, ends up he murdered his girlfriend, put her in a container in his closet to decompose her body. Of course the mocking bird press hid that quite well back then.
Our atmospheric gases are nitrogen (78.1%), oxygen (20.9%), argon (0.93%), and carbon dioxide (0.04%) and I wish I could post the animated gif I have of our sun sailing through the galaxy at nearly 500K MPH while the planets and comets trail behind it in a big spiral. Man is not in charge but some folk think otherwise.
Of course there is climate change. Only a fool would believe otherwise. To believe we can affect it or stop it is equally foolish. The climate has changed and will continue to as long as the earth orbits the sun.
The Earth changes in a rhythm of ancient patterns that man has yet to understand. "Climate Change" as hocked by Gore and other con men is for their self enrichment and for that purpose it has worked very well.
In the late 70's the core samples were destroyed, the information was permanently altered, and the changers have died. Everything about it then and since has been criminal.
If you're not "struggling to understand" why your predictions don't match reality, you're not doing science. Their predictions of 2 degrees (C) temperature rise by the year 2100 have a calculated accuracy of 40 degrees C. It could be 25 degrees hotter or 15 degrees cooler.
How can anyone think that's even worth talking about? In engineering, we don't accept models unless the accuracy is small compared to the prediction.
Wake me up when they can model the effects of clouds to within 1/20 C.
I was in Electrical Engineering in college in the mid 70s. I took an elective course I always have remembered it was called Physical Geometry. I really taught about the weather and how it changed. It also showed that governments put out weather capture modules at places starting in the mid to late 1800s and since then they have become more urban and in many cases in airports that are now jet washed. These also are random and miss most of the world such as rural, mtn, sea, and jungle areas. This causes bad readings of what is happening in the world.
I just finished reading Michael Shellenberger’s book “Apocalypse Never”. I cannot recommend it highly enough if you want to be informed on the way that people would react if they actually cared about the environment instead of a power grab.
And the limp-wrist, hysterical libtards keep screaming, "The End of the World is Near!" while scumbags like Al "the bore" Gore become millionaires and as Congress throws trillions of good monies after bad trying the change the weather.
ReplyDeleteIn my mind, "change the weather" people are simply in seek of being recognized as divine beings. All that's missing is their designation of someone as g_d.
DeleteI am old enough to remember in the 1970s when ALL of the "experts" were predicting that the next Ice Age was almost upon us! Hmmm, I wonder how that prediction turned out!? Also, I live in Michigan, a state that was formed when thousands of years ago, the earth cooled and great glaciers were formed that scraped away much land, forming the Great Lakes. But then the earth warmed up again and those glaciers went away. I challenge anyone who believes in the idiotic "climate change" agenda how that happened. I mention to them that there weren't any SUVs belching exhaust into the air, nor were there any factories polluting the air. In fact, there weren't that many humans around in the entire world at that time. So I tell them if they can't answer how the Great Lakes were formed by the earth cooling and warming again, that they don't know that they are talking about!
ReplyDelete--Rusty
It seems to me that at one time, Europe, Asia, and almost all of North America was covered by ice. Some it over a mile thick. Almost no people, no industry, no cars, no oil powered anything and it all melted. Gee, imagine that.
ReplyDeleteAll I can say is that these "scientists" should abase themselves in front of all real scientists and apologize profusely for being so lazy and stupid. WATER VAPOR does hundreds of times more infrared forcing than CO2, and anybody who knows anything at all about chemistry and the environmental systems knows that "CO2 Warming" is a complete crock of scheiss.
ReplyDeleteTruly nice enlightened progressives. Both where comintern trained operatives, went on foreign "cultural/agrarian seminars", (boot camp for western marxist agents), during their college years, in Cuba and Soviet Russia, this actors co-partner, (co-author for their famous Whole Earth book), was truly into green methods, he was tried for homicide, ends up he murdered his girlfriend, put her in a container in his closet to decompose her body. Of course the mocking bird press hid that quite well back then.
ReplyDeleteOur atmospheric gases are nitrogen (78.1%), oxygen (20.9%), argon (0.93%), and carbon dioxide (0.04%) and I wish I could post the animated gif I have of our sun sailing through the galaxy at nearly 500K MPH while the planets and comets trail behind it in a big spiral. Man is not in charge but some folk think otherwise.
ReplyDeleteOf course there is climate change. Only a fool would believe otherwise. To believe we can affect it or stop it is equally foolish. The climate has changed and will continue to as long as the earth orbits the sun.
ReplyDeleteThe Earth changes in a rhythm of ancient patterns that man has yet to understand.
Delete"Climate Change" as hocked by Gore and other con men is for their self enrichment and for that purpose it has worked very well.
According to the ice core samples, CO follows temperature, not the other way around.
ReplyDeleteIn the late 70's the core samples were destroyed, the information was permanently altered, and the changers have died. Everything about it then and since has been criminal.
DeleteIf you're not "struggling to understand" why your predictions don't match reality, you're not doing science. Their predictions of 2 degrees (C) temperature rise by the year 2100 have a calculated accuracy of 40 degrees C. It could be 25 degrees hotter or 15 degrees cooler.
ReplyDeleteHow can anyone think that's even worth talking about? In engineering, we don't accept models unless the accuracy is small compared to the prediction.
Wake me up when they can model the effects of clouds to within 1/20 C.
What if CO2 is GOOD for the environment! It is.
ReplyDeleteOoh! I know! Pick me- pick me!
ReplyDeleteMany years ago, when this bullshit started, I checked by big bag of fks and found none to give.
ReplyDeleteI've been right ever since.
Libs always ignore what is inconvenient to their agenda.
ReplyDeleteI was in Electrical Engineering in college in the mid 70s. I took an elective course I always have remembered it was called Physical Geometry. I really taught about the weather and how it changed. It also showed that governments put out weather capture modules at places starting in the mid to late 1800s and since then they have become more urban and in many cases in airports that are now jet washed. These also are random and miss most of the world such as rural, mtn, sea, and jungle areas. This causes bad readings of what is happening in the world.
ReplyDeleteWhich were "good" readings if you had an agenda...
DeleteI just finished reading Michael Shellenberger’s book “Apocalypse Never”. I cannot recommend it highly enough if you want to be informed on the way that people would react if they actually cared about the environment instead of a power grab.
ReplyDelete