And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thursday, January 2, 2025
This has been the subject of conversation in the comments before, so I thought it might be of interest.
Look, its difficult pill to accept, but you got to look at it from a diff direction, goes like this: Everything, everything they have told us to believe is a lie.
Trust but verify is word. Looking at it this way, suddenly many things begin to make a lot if sense, untill then, they gull us lie to us deceive us freely and with abandon, because when they lie about everything, how can you tell? It is like a fish, a fish does not notice it lives in water. It is an awful thing to have to pre-suppose, but again, they do lie about everything, they accuse anyone who questions them of being a conspiracy theorist, a ray-cist, an extremist, and so on. And why might the question be, if they are not lying, would they not be concerned when they are questioned? Right? People who tell the truth need not justify themselves, the truth never lies and niether do people who speak truth as they understand it. Otherwise everything should be suspect, it is only reasonable to do so. Rightfully so. Aside, this whole AI thing is about control control control. Controlling human behavior, and they are super uber into AI, they need AI, their lies are getting threadbare, half the world is fully disgusted by them and their lies, not inly that, their lies are lethal, homicidal, did they not just try to kill millions if us with a poison jabby jabby thing? And they are still trying to impose this mass murder. The moon landing question is ridiculous, not that it is true or not, but that it is another method of controlling people attention, a shiny object for distracting people from a lot more important matters. Does it really matter it happened or not? Not really. It never mattered on the face of it. It was a way to launder billions of bucks unknowing to we whose money was used. Like with the Ukraine thing. The supposed oresidents son was involved in the movement if 10 Billion US bucks thru shadow corps and institutions, and that was only a small amount compared to the almost 1trillion in money laundered thru Ukraine to date. The moon thing is silly in comparison.
We need the Indian's to prove that? Don't make me laugh. Its ridiculous. Anyone can use AI and create a set of pictures like that. Regardless it happened or not. Proves nothing either way. It is ridiculous. And i refuse to be a sucker, fed up with being gulled to control me. F these feffers.
If we went to the moon, why is it that there is no record of the calculations needed in order to achieve this? And please don't give me the BS line of they were lost or thrown out. I'm sure those would have been classified as Top Secret documents. As such, there are controls and long retention periods. No way in hell those were "lost."
A lot of it was on big wide magnetic tape. They say they reused some tape cuz it was spensive. You know how NASA(Never A Straight Answer) loves to save us taxpayers money.
All the argument, when simply reading the caption clarifies it. It's "disapproving", and I certainly agree with that sentiment. Whether it "disproves" anything isn't even being brought up. :)
We may go there someday, but not via NASA, that Affirmative Action paradise just blows stuff up. They may not do much work but their EEO stats are awesome.
And so far as these photos proving anything, meh, we just need to devise bigger conspiracies to explain it all away.
Ever hear the saying, "physics is a bitch?" Read up on what most plain old amateur astronomers know about optics and resolution. Bottom line, better resolution requires bigger objectives on the telescope lens (telephoto lens). That's heavier and takes up more room, both of those are bad answers to the satellite designer.
Here’s another data point. The TV signals that were broadcast to the world on 20 July 1969 were collected and processed by the receiver at Parkes Observatory (in Australia) while pointing their antenna at the moon. This much is verifiable using their operational logs. You can choose to believe or not, but the truth is out there and it’s not hidden like in the X-Files.
If the landings were fakes the Soviets would told the world. They were tracking Apollo also. Plus, the thousands of people that would have been in on the hoax. Even Hillary couldn't silence that many people.
Moronic idiots who deny the moon landings do so because their ignorance prevents them from addressing two painfully obvious issues. 1) If we faked the moon landings, why didn’t the Soviets fake one? 2) The special effects technology of 1969 was such that it would have been technically easier to go to the moon than produce the video images we have.
Uuhhh, because of the angle of the sun? "Simple physics" dictates that not all of the face of the moon faces directly at the sun (unless you claim it's flat) and it's not the atmosphere that creates shadows.
find a book named "Lost tribes and lost continents" by Robert Wauchope. find out of print books at www.ABEbooks.com, a broker for used booksellers
bottom line :some losers want to be an expert at something, but they don't want to study. so they become an expert at something which can not be proven. And their name shall be "anomymous"
BFF in high school Dad was the head of HR at NASA in the 60"s. Their basement rec room was chock full of rocket miniatures and signed photos of the teams. He would have to been in on the hoax and my conversations with him about the treasure trove would have been telling. In hindsight I never asked for one of the pics. They moved back to the east coast the next year, still keep in touch with my buddy. His Dad passed in 2001 (the irony).
The only thing NaSa was better at back then vs now is laundering of the peoples money. Never any stars.. EVER. Show me star pictures taken from any of these moon missions, including the shuttle or international space station... They don't exist. Cannot hoax that one! Not one effing person has snapped a pic of the stars from the "dark side" of the moon, aboard the shuttle or space station on the back side of Earth? It has to be breathtaking!! No atmosphere!! Whatever.. It was enough for me to decide its all bullshit after watching the first AstroNots to walk on the moon, get back to Earth, get in front of the cameras, and act and talk like they all just watched their favorite dog get smoked by a car on the road in front of their house. These effers just won the Superbowl of super bowls we are told! Lying is tough in front of an audience I suppose. Their excuses as to why they didn't see any stars is hysterical. Everything is a lie folks. Everything.
fake shit disproving previous fake shit?
ReplyDeleteI don't know either way.
But if one is fake why wouldn't the other be fake as well?
With all the gov't lying thats been going on for the last 80+ years (JFK, etc.) is it any wonder that people are suspect and jaded?
It's no wonder at all. To the contrary, it's a wonder we all are as credible as we are when it comes to the government.
DeleteLook, its difficult pill to accept, but you got to look at it from a diff direction, goes like this:
ReplyDeleteEverything, everything they have told us to believe is a lie.
Trust but verify is word.
Looking at it this way, suddenly many things begin to make a lot if sense, untill then, they gull us lie to us deceive us freely and with abandon, because when they lie about everything, how can you tell? It is like a fish, a fish does not notice it lives in water.
It is an awful thing to have to pre-suppose, but again, they do lie about everything, they accuse anyone who questions them of being a conspiracy theorist, a ray-cist, an extremist, and so on. And why might the question be, if they are not lying, would they not be concerned when they are questioned? Right? People who tell the truth need not justify themselves, the truth never lies and niether do people who speak truth as they understand it. Otherwise everything should be suspect, it is only reasonable to do so. Rightfully so.
Aside, this whole AI thing is about control control control. Controlling human behavior, and they are super uber into AI, they need AI, their lies are getting threadbare, half the world is fully disgusted by them and their lies, not inly that, their lies are lethal, homicidal, did they not just try to kill millions if us with a poison jabby jabby thing? And they are still trying to impose this mass murder.
The moon landing question is ridiculous, not that it is true or not, but that it is another method of controlling people attention, a shiny object for distracting people from a lot more important matters. Does it really matter it happened or not? Not really. It never mattered on the face of it. It was a way to launder billions of bucks unknowing to we whose money was used. Like with the Ukraine thing. The supposed oresidents son was involved in the movement if 10 Billion US bucks thru shadow corps and institutions, and that was only a small amount compared to the almost 1trillion in money laundered thru Ukraine to date. The moon thing is silly in comparison.
Who are they?
DeleteWe need the Indian's to prove that? Don't make me laugh. Its ridiculous. Anyone can use AI and create a set of pictures like that. Regardless it happened or not. Proves nothing either way. It is ridiculous. And i refuse to be a sucker, fed up with being gulled to control me. F these feffers.
ReplyDeleteWake me when there's a photo of Elon waving from Mars.
ReplyDeleteWhere is the pic of the car that was left behind and the golf clubs?!
ReplyDeleteChutes Magoo
https://www.space.com/12835-nasa-apollo-moon-landing-sites-photos-lro.html
DeleteLooks like cheese to me.
ReplyDeleteThe fake moon landing(s!) theory was unheard of before the 1977 movie Capricorn One, about the U.S. government faking a Mars landing.
ReplyDeleteWe went to the moon.
And will go again.
DeleteDamn straight!
DeleteIf we weren't there, where the hell did we get the moon rocks then... huh?
The moon rocks were petrified wood.
DeleteSome were. They say they got the moon rocks from Antarctica. And if we went, why haven't we even been out of Earth's orbit since?
DeleteThere was no petrified wood in the moon rocks.
DeleteIf we went to the moon, why is it that there is no record of the calculations needed in order to achieve this? And please don't give me the BS line of they were lost or thrown out. I'm sure those would have been classified as Top Secret documents. As such, there are controls and long retention periods. No way in hell those were "lost."
DeleteA lot of it was on big wide magnetic tape. They say they reused some tape cuz it was spensive. You know how NASA(Never A Straight Answer) loves to save us taxpayers money.
DeleteMofo...
DeleteI've met one of the programmers of the Apollo controls ring and one of the designers of the buggy. Nice fellows.
Tim in Spring Hill
So the Indian government would NEVER LIE? LOL
ReplyDeleteAll the argument, when simply reading the caption clarifies it. It's "disapproving", and I certainly agree with that sentiment. Whether it "disproves" anything isn't even being brought up. :)
ReplyDeletesearch Jack Parsons and hang on.
ReplyDeleteWe may go there someday, but not via NASA, that Affirmative Action paradise just blows stuff up. They may not do much work but their EEO stats are awesome.
ReplyDeleteAnd so far as these photos proving anything, meh, we just need to devise bigger conspiracies to explain it all away.
And NASA is even better at Muslim outreach...
DeleteIsn't that their primary mission now, per Mr. Soetoro?
DeleteFor 2021, one would think that their snaps would have a better resolution.
ReplyDeleteEver hear the saying, "physics is a bitch?" Read up on what most plain old amateur astronomers know about optics and resolution. Bottom line, better resolution requires bigger objectives on the telescope lens (telephoto lens). That's heavier and takes up more room, both of those are bad answers to the satellite designer.
DeleteSorry, I know a bit about such things, sir. I won't go into details.
DeleteHere’s another data point. The TV signals that were broadcast to the world on 20 July 1969 were collected and processed by the receiver at Parkes Observatory (in Australia) while pointing their antenna at the moon. This much is verifiable using their operational logs. You can choose to believe or not, but the truth is out there and it’s not hidden like in the X-Files.
ReplyDeleteAnd they of course would never lie for the US government. LOL
DeleteIf the landings were fakes the Soviets would told the world. They were tracking Apollo also. Plus, the thousands of people that would have been in on the hoax. Even Hillary couldn't silence that many people.
ReplyDeleteNot enough to change my mind.
ReplyDeleteVan Allen radiation belts says we didn't land on the moon.
ReplyDeleteA lot of people need to go back to pre Department of Education
school
Moronic idiots who deny the moon landings do so because their ignorance prevents them from addressing two painfully obvious issues.
ReplyDelete1) If we faked the moon landings, why didn’t the Soviets fake one?
2) The special effects technology of 1969 was such that it would have been technically easier to go to the moon than produce the video images we have.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes
ReplyDeleteFake pictures. The moon has no atmosphere. So why are the landers making shadows on the ground. No air = no shadows. Simple physics.
ReplyDeleteUuhhh, because of the angle of the sun? "Simple physics" dictates that not all of the face of the moon faces directly at the sun (unless you claim it's flat) and it's not the atmosphere that creates shadows.
DeleteThis better be a joke.
DeleteLight produces shadows not atmosphere. Atmosphere on earth is the air we breath. Air does not make shadows.
DeleteAnonymous January 3, 2025 at 4:53 AM ... an example of DEI education
DeleteWhat are you... high? - Kojak
Deletefind a book named "Lost tribes and lost continents" by Robert Wauchope. find out of print books at www.ABEbooks.com, a broker for used booksellers
ReplyDeletebottom line :some losers want to be an expert at something, but they don't want to study. so they become an expert at something which can not be proven. And their name shall be "anomymous"
BFF in high school Dad was the head of HR at NASA in the 60"s. Their basement rec room was chock full of rocket miniatures and signed photos of the teams. He
ReplyDeletewould have to been in on the hoax and my conversations with him about the treasure trove would have been telling. In hindsight I never asked for one of the pics. They moved back to the east coast the next year, still keep in touch with my buddy. His Dad passed in 2001 (the irony).
Spin
Easier to go there than fake it with 60s tech. NASA may be a joke now but wasn't then.
ReplyDeleteWagging the Moondoggie by Dave McGowan is a humorous skeptic's view
ReplyDeleteof the Apollo missions
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
The only thing NaSa was better at back then vs now is laundering of the peoples money.
ReplyDeleteNever any stars.. EVER.
Show me star pictures taken from any of these moon missions, including the shuttle or international space station... They don't exist. Cannot hoax that one! Not one effing person has snapped a pic of the stars from the "dark side" of the moon, aboard the shuttle or space station on the back side of Earth? It has to be breathtaking!! No atmosphere!!
Whatever..
It was enough for me to decide its all bullshit after watching the first AstroNots to walk on the moon, get back to Earth, get in front of the cameras, and act and talk like they all just watched their favorite dog get smoked by a car on the road in front of their house. These effers just won the Superbowl of super bowls we are told! Lying is tough in front of an audience I suppose. Their excuses as to why they didn't see any stars is hysterical.
Everything is a lie folks. Everything.