And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Yeah. That's always what I look for when I see a picture of a pretty girl and then try to figure out if the picture is for real or not, is to look closely at the draw strings of her sweatshirt to determine if they've been edited using artificial intelligence.
Your comment makes me wonder if you're the one that's not for real, Man. Why can't you just enjoy a picture of a pretty girl?
Different Anon here - I think Anon 2:21 is pointing out how fuzzy the draw strings are compared to the sharpness of this lovely lasses face. Though a bit of disparity due to focus distance makes sense, this one does suggest some artistic licenses were used to produce the image. In fact the most sharpest detail is her face - a lot of surrounding nearby has a bit of soft focus.
I'm no where near expert on detecting AI but this does make me a bit suspicious.
Short focal length, F1.4 - F2.8, as photographer was looking for bokeh. Look at the softness at the edge of her arm against the waist, very similar focus to the 'drawstrings'. AI would have that edge a lot sharper.
If I could create a lovely companion, she would look a lot like her.
ReplyDeleteAI likely created this pic, so…
DeleteA lot of some huge hair.
ReplyDeleteAnother beauty! You do find them CW...
ReplyDeleteNear angelic. Bet she smells nice, too.
ReplyDeleteShe has the same soft beauty that Ingrid Bergman had at a similar age.
ReplyDeletePretty lady. In fact a very pretty lady who I would crawl over a mile of burning coals and broken glass to meet.
ReplyDeleteLook around. Beauty is everywhere.
ReplyDeleteThat's what my gastroenterologist said as he was inserting the colonoscope and kissed me behind the ear
DeleteBog...get help....soon.
DeleteThat is definitely an AI generated image. Sorry guys... lolllll She is a beauty though.
ReplyDeleteWell you would be the one to know!
DeleteAI has a good imagination and high standards
ReplyDeleteWhat a beauty!!!
ReplyDelete***SIGH!!!***
A real beauty. America 40 years ago was filled with girls that looked that good - no AI needed!
ReplyDeleteNot AI. AI would have added huge breasticles.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteBillsbowl - true dat.
A wholesomely beautiful lass! They are still out there.
ReplyDeleteShe is very lovely!
ReplyDeleteWith all that hair, she better marry a plumber...
ReplyDeleteLooks a hop and a skip away from moldylocks.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely AI. Look closely at the pull strings on that sweatshirt.
ReplyDeleteYeah. That's always what I look for when I see a picture of a pretty girl and then try to figure out if the picture is for real or not, is to look closely at the draw strings of her sweatshirt to determine if they've been edited using artificial intelligence.
DeleteYour comment makes me wonder if you're the one that's not for real, Man. Why can't you just enjoy a picture of a pretty girl?
Different Anon here - I think Anon 2:21 is pointing out how fuzzy the draw strings are compared to the sharpness of this lovely lasses face. Though a bit of disparity due to focus distance makes sense, this one does suggest some artistic licenses were used to produce the image. In fact the most sharpest detail is her face - a lot of surrounding nearby has a bit of soft focus.
DeleteI'm no where near expert on detecting AI but this does make me a bit suspicious.
It's not the fuzziness of the drawstrings. Their attachment points and shadows are visual nonsense.
DeletePhwoar
ReplyDeleteShort focal length, F1.4 - F2.8, as photographer was looking for bokeh. Look at the softness at the edge of her arm against the waist, very similar focus to the 'drawstrings'. AI would have that edge a lot sharper.
ReplyDeleteA lovely lass, nonetheless.
Google reverse image search returns with only A.I. reference. And we all know that Google is a trusted and reliable source that would never mislead.
ReplyDelete