Wednesday, July 5, 2023

A long dangerous tube

 


15 comments:

  1. 637 class? I'm not sure, as the picture seems to have squashed it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not a US sub of any class I'm familiar with. The bow section is too long for fast attacks, the aft section too short for an SSBN or SSGN, the sail is to wide and short, and the hull isn't round enough (the ladders port and starboard behind the sail go nearly straight down.

      It might be a Japanese diesel boat.

      Delete
  2. Clearly the officers, lacking safety lines and lifejackets, are expendable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At first I thought they were nekkid. It's early.

      Delete
  3. no missile hatches, 'fraid not. I can not id class, sail looks to be midship.

    ReplyDelete
  4. British Trafalgar Class SSN

    ReplyDelete
  5. US Navy SSBN. The CSA holes (4 port, 4 stbd) are the SSBN tell. The angle is such that it's hard to see the hatches on the missile deck. It can only be US Navy with the khakis for CPOs/Officers and the blue dungarees for the lookouts on standing on the fairwater planes. That's a 640 class SSBN (USN), the fairwater planes are low on the sail unlike the 616/627 class ones.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No turtleback? Not a boomer. After section far too short.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Google Lens image search says it is the SSBN-643 George Bancroft. From the late 80s,. Good call Anon @12:22. The perspective on the picture really extends the nose and masks the ramp at the back of the turtleback into the engine room hull.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Short sail? Not a boomer. Permit-class SSN.

      Delete
    2. Look at photos of the 540-class boomers, That is the wrong sail for a Permit or early LA-class boat.

      Delete
  8. I did 9 patrols on the Bancroft Gold crew 1974 to 1978. STS1(SS).

    ReplyDelete