Thursday, July 29, 2021

Your Friendly Smile of the Morning

 


20 comments:

  1. If them eyeballz were any farther apart you could plant a couple rows of corn in the middle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +10 Ghost. I think it results from surgery intended to keep the bisected mono-brow from growing back together.

      Delete
    2. That's what happens when yer pigtails is too tight.

      Delete
    3. Pigtails? I thought they was love handles.

      Delete
    4. You guys are stupid. It's a wide angle lens.
      Don't be like Joe . . .

      Delete
  2. I was a USAF Security Policeman from 1980-1984. We had some smokin' hotties in our squadron.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes.
    She can be found here.

    https://twitter.com/Alex35683925

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well now. She's tatted up like a comic book, and wears black rifle coffee t-shirts. And everybody already knows why females enter the military, right?

      Delete
    2. Well, this very attractive young woman is lucky that she lives in an age where technology can get rid of her Tramp Stamp tattoos. In 30 years, with a few thousand dollars, she can probably look normal again and be done with all of the sagging artwork.

      Delete
  4. The Israelis didn't get this one! Ours are the best. Semper Fi ('59-'73).

    ReplyDelete
  5. She could put me in handcuffs anytime...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Generally, in the military that much make-up is called camouflage. She's iced as a fat boy's birthday cake.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Back in the 80's & 90's one of the unwritten recruiter rules was the ugly girls got referred to the Army or Navy. I have seen a lot of really beautiful women in the Air Force and Marines in the 21 years I was in the Air Force. I spent 12 years in Joint Services so I did get to see what the other branches had to offer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you want here are more military cuties around the world
    https://inchhighguy.wordpress.com/2021/07/24/women-warriors-127/

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I was in (1970s) those braids would have been tucked up under her cover, not hanging down past the collar. 35-10, wasn't it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, definitely in violation of 35-10.

      Delete
    2. I was wondering if those braids would be an asset or a liability in breaking up a bar fight.

      Delete
  10. Is this your new daughter-in-law?

    ReplyDelete