Your good news of the day, especially if you live in DC

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is expected to issue an order that strikes down the D.C. law that requires applicants who want a conceal-carry permit to prove they have “good reason” to carry a firearm in public. Under the law, reasons to get a concealed carry license might include a personal threat, or a job that requires a person to carry or protect cash or valuables.

“After weighing the consequences of an adverse decision on our city and indeed across the country, including neighboring jurisdictions,” Racine said he’d decided against a challenge in the Supreme Court. Like the District, Maryland has a ”good reason” requirement for applicants seeking a license to carry a firearm.

Yeah, like the same rights apply nationwide.  Maryland might have a similar rule now, but that rule will suffer the same fate in court is someone challenges it.

Newsham said the decision won’t drastically change the process of applying for a gun permit.

“We will tweak our process” Newsham said. “All we do is eliminate the ‘good reason’ provision in the application process. All the other stringent requirements that we have in the District of Columbia to obtain a carry permit will remain intact.”

So, the government will still do everything it possibly can to deny you your constitutional right to protect yourself and your family.  That right is a natural right, it does not exist because a government granted it, and cannot be infringed by the government except for very specific reasons. 

Newsham said 123 people in D.C. have a license that allows them to carry a firearm. Newsham adds that there have been 668 applications to carry a firearm, with 444 denied because they didn’t meet the “good reason” standard.

The "good reason" standard was just an excuse to keep folk from carrying a gun. Any government will lust for a monopoly on the use of force, and the framers of the constitution knew that was a very bad thing.

Bowser joined Racine and the police chief in stressing that anyone wanting to carry a firearm in the District would still have to go through the application process.

“I want to make it perfectly clear that carrying a pistol without a license is a crime for which you will be arrested and charged and prosecuted,” Bowser said.

What part of "...the people's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed..." do you not understand, Mr. Bowser?

D.C.’s law suffered a setback in July when a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that it infringes on residents’ Second Amendment rights. Gun rights advocates have long argued that D.C.’s law is unconstitutional and that it makes it difficult for people to defend themselves.

D.C. officials later asked the Court of Appeals to rehear the case as a full court. However, in a brief order last week, the court said it would not reconsider the ruling, leaving the city’s attorney general with no choice but to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court or back down.

The argument against taking the case to the Supreme Court is based on concerns by gun-control advocates that an unfavorable ruling by the nation’s highest court could nullify conceal-carry restrictions in states across the country, including Maryland.

Yep, and a Supreme Court decision recognizing the illegality of this constitutional infringement would be a good thing.

With the action by the appeals court in Wrenn vs. the District of Columbia, its possible that anyone seeking a conceal-carry permit could begin applying for one as early as Thursday.

Apply, and when they try to deny you, sue again, until they stop.