Thursday, February 26, 2026

If I were in charge, by law all able bodied men over 30 and without a criminal record would need to have one of these and 300 rounds of ammo.

 


28 comments:

  1. 300 rounds of ammo? That won't last one morning at the range....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. needs at least one more zero on that 300 round decree.

      Delete
    2. Making noise is not the idea, sir.

      Yeah, I gave up on public ranges after watching idiots with poor muzzle control and fingers on the triggers burning up boxes of ammo at "targets" at 50 feet.

      Several of them locally wonder why they cannot get a deer during the season.

      Every year I go out and run a few rounds through my deer rifle to ensure it's still zeroed and then go get my deer.

      Delete
    3. I live near Mountain View Arkansas and we have a range just north of us in the National Forrest. There are actually two federal ranges with one being for handguns and the other for long guns. There are no range officers and no charges for use on the range. The only accident that I know of was when a young boy and his grandmother were out there testing his home made shot gun. A larch piece of metal blew off of the receiver and hit his grandmother. There have been no changes in the range use. I have to wonder if there are ant other federal ranges in the country.

      Delete
  2. My thoughts exactly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. they actually do that in switzerland.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In the original 405 Winchester? Nice. I'd take it in Aught Six, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or 30-40, another classic chambering for the 1895.

      Now about that 300-rounds. It was Kipling who said that a man could never have too many books, too much red wine or too much ammunition. So more than that, please.

      Delete
  5. You'll have to take my bolties out of my cold dead hands. Lever actions? Bah.

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://notthebee.com/article/west-virginia-introduces-bill-for-the-government-to-sell-machine-guns-to-americans-?utm_source=Not+The+Bee+Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=02252026

    ReplyDelete
  7. That's very nice but the AR-15 is the modern version of the Roman Gladius sword.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why? I'm now in my mid 60's, have never owned a gun and never will. Don't see the need.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Better to have and not need than need and not have.

      Delete
    2. Good, that leaves at least one more for those that do!

      Delete
    3. I've know people with the same misguided attitude toward books.

      Delete
    4. Ignorance is bliss.

      Delete
    5. If you didn't learn during the lockdown you never will.

      Delete
  9. Only 300 rounds?

    My gun ownership gives me a sense of safety. Personal, familial and domicile safety.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Country living, sure. City dwellers too? 80%+ of us live in the city.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the city, depending on neighborhood, you are far more likely to need a gun than rural folks.

      Delete
  11. Winchester 1895 was one of Teddy's favorites.

    ReplyDelete
  12. recently was swatted by some darkweb nutjob. opened door one morning with 4 M4s in my face. first thing they asked , any guns in the house? Drone watched for 20 minutes prior. We really don't stand a chance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what they said in 1775. The next year we declared independence and in 1783 we were free.

      Delete
    2. It's the numbers that matter. If we ever get organized leadership...

      Delete
  13. You might fill different about your need if you are looking at a man with a revolver pointing it at me, my wife and very young son. I have never left the house unarmed to this day.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Close, mines a 1965, Savage 99 in 308. It'll do.

    ReplyDelete