Saturday, February 18, 2023

Greater China. Heck, if we're dividing Siberia, then we should occupy everything north of the Sea of Okhotsk

 


26 comments:

  1. WWIII has already started. Everyday a new distraction from Nordstream, Hunter Biden and stolen elections. Spy balloons, destroying the food supply, wrecking the supply chain, new viruses, attacks on free speech, train wrecks and deadly chemical spills and fires, China flexing its' muscles' everywhere. And Biden is giving away our munitions to foreign governments. The naive will say it's all coincidence right up until they're put in concentration camps.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Putin missiles strike the three gorges dam and china is done,,, over and out. hello stone age china. easy peasy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or strikes DC...and the cabal is finished.

      Delete
    2. Probably both, if it comes to that...

      Delete
  3. ^^^This^^^ and China unlike our clown world leadership knows not to get into a multi-front war.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Referring to Russia at the end of WW-II General George Patton said: "We may have been fighting the wrong enemy all along. But while we're here, we should go after the bastards now, 'cause we're gonna have to fight 'em eventually". Too bad the politicians didn't listen to him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RU will prove to be the best ally of USA...in the end.

      Delete
    2. After WW2 the US made allies of it former enemies. After the Cold War the US kept Russia as an enemy.

      Our rulers have failed us.

      And so far as occupying Sea of Okhotsk? The US would be far better served by occupying the northern border states of Mexico, all of them, and building the wall on their southern border. As a buffer zone held under martial law.

      Delete
  5. The Russians would have mopped the floor with USA at the end of WWII. Manpower alone was hugely in favor of RU, as well as tanks, planes, etc..,,
    Russia won WWII in Europe, inflicting 80% of German casualties.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good thing we nuked Japan then. If not Japanese culture would be something read about in books.

      Delete
    2. Seldom hear it expressed but if Japan hadn't surrendered, invasion would likely have ended with near extinction as a people & nation.

      Delete
  6. I read somewhere that China has over 4 million people living on Russia soil along there Northern border. Overflow.

    Someone pondered, “what if Germany teams up with Russia (crushes their Green Party) aligns itself with China. Would the US have any foothold on Europe?

    Is it all about keeping Germany from having access to cheap energy?

    MF

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The US should not have a ‘foothold’ on Europe, anymore than they should have a foothold on us, USA.

      Delete
    2. It bears repeating: It has been said the true purpose of NATO is to keep Germany down, the Russians OUT, and America IN, Europe.

      A (unified) Germany's industrial manufacturing abilities, coupled with Russia's cheap energy and raw materials keeps someone in DC awake at night.

      Delete
  7. We are more likely to attack and invade the UK than China is to annex Siberia. China needs Russia more as a military ally. It gets all the resources it wants from Russia without the risk of a nuclear war with Russia. It needs the Russian military to back up the Chinese military.

    You are more likely to see Chinese troops in Ukraine supporting Russian troops.

    Don't overthink this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We invaded the UK as soon as we formed NATO.

      Delete
  8. No kidding...and we could be captured physically by China...quest for farmland, ask Bill G ‘who he is buying for’...?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Do you seriously believe that over 90% of the Russian military is lined up solely against Ukraine? Delusional.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yeah right, the slopes will invade the Northwest Territories next.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There are two major Russian ICBM fields in the “Chinese sector”, and 5 Russian SSBMs home ported on the Pacific coast. The Russians could nuke a billion Chinese, that’s what they could do about it,

    ReplyDelete
  12. Canada is China's Siberia.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Back in 1960, my geography teacher told us that China could march its population, four abreast, into the sea 24/7/365 and they would never run out of people to keep the march going.

    Notice that this map expands Chinese territory all the way west to the Urals where a large percentage of Russia's natural resource wealth is located, like gold, as a for instance, which they have been mining furiously for the last two decades.

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
  14. Russia has, at most, 20% of its military involved in Ukraine.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Not much that Russia could do?" I'm thinking that using a couple thousand nukes on China might be a start.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not gonna Happen. Last Year, Tsar Vladimir the Bad had a Meeting with Winnie Xi Pooh, and they put that Dispute on Hold so that Country 404 can be Cleaned Up. Right after the Meeting, most of the Forces on both sdies were Withdrawn, Red Army Units sent West in a Movement that stopped all Commercial Rail Traffic for two Weeks. Russia and China are on the same page about 'dealing with' Globohomo, inc.

    ReplyDelete