Sunday, November 16, 2025

This made me flush with patriotism.

 



19 comments:

  1. Yes, I know why, but like the latest RN efforts, ugly doesn't do it justice.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One dinky little gun….they better have something to fight off a drone swarm. That 5” peashooter is not going to do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is another 5 in. gun, out of sight, aft of the flight deck and two Phalanx CIWS, one per side.

      Delete
  3. Hate to say it but it's the ocean going version of the Obama Chicago monstrosity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good description of the Kenyan-born muslim's (small "m" intended) monument

      Delete
    2. That’s not a nice way to talk about your father

      Delete
    3. DUDE: The Kenyan-born muslim is 64 years old, he is 15 years younger than me.

      Delete
    4. Oh wait! You mean when I had an encounter with an African gorilla in Kenya, then the idiot might be my son.

      Delete
  4. USS Normandy CG 60.

    The Ticonderogas are slated for retirement, ships with their capabilities are not yet available.

    The Tikes carry a lot of missiles in VLS, but they, and all modern warships, have essentially no armor. Considering what an open boat did to the Cole, the survivability of modern warships is highly doubtful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The President has expressed those same doubts. He's mentioned bringing back Battleships. Interestingly, last year they dry docked the New Jersey and did a bunch of repairs.

      Delete
  5. Wouldn't care to be in that top-heavy wind catcher in a gale.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's ugly, ships should be graceful & look good ...I'd like to think we can do the modern stuff without it being ugly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks a little better from the side:

      https://www.seaforces.org/usnships/cg/CG-60_DAT/CG-60-USS-Normandy-162.jpg

      Delete
    2. This COULD be AI--------

      Delete
  7. They did much better with the DDG version because as they said above, the Ticos were really ugly looking ships even before they bolted on things.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Commissioned 9 December 1989
    Decommissioned 25 September 2025

    ReplyDelete
  9. High windage, low freeboard, a puke queen guaranteed!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I made a field service trip to San Pedro, CA, to install a pair of power-operated hatches over Vincennes' (CG-49) ammo elevators. She had already been out on sea trials but was brought back to dry-dock to have more lead installed in her keel. Too much topside weight. Note the big octagonal panels on the front and the port side. There are two more, aft and on the starboard side. They are part of the phased-array radar system. (With those, the emitted radar beam can be electronically steered, so you don't need a rotating antenna. Given the need to have large mounting surfaces for those panels, I wonder if that drove - at least partly - the tall superstructure.)
    I spent six weeks as a midshipman aboard an old destroyer (Epperson, DD-719) , with four 600-psi steam boilers and turbines, and I thought the fire-rooms and engine-rooms were congested. But as I passed an open hatch serving the the Vincennes power plant . . . You probably have no idea how much ducting there must be for gas-turbine main propulsion. Incredible bulk!

    ReplyDelete