Saturday, October 11, 2025

The bottom picture

 






12 comments:

  1. Before we were ruled by safetyism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The building in the top photo is not the building in the bottom animation. Top photo is five stories and not set up for moving in the same way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct. That's why I said "the bottom picture."

      Delete
  3. As for the top picture, I'd really like to see the crane where all those cables are attached to !

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I get cranky bringing a load of alfalfa home for our livestock…

    ReplyDelete
  5. The repositioned Indiana Bell building served another 33 years before being torn down.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very impressive piece of work to say the least.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The top picture is five stories, the bottom picture is eight or nine stories.
    Neither of them reflects a 52' move.
    So neither of them is the building in question, or the "fact" is suspect.

    Mom worked for Pac Bell for 42 years. Having a pretty good idea how many telephone wire pairs would be involved in a typical Bell telephone building in 1930, and the requirement to move them 52', which was probably not factored into their connection as originally installed, I think the whole thing is codswallop.

    YMMV.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very likely it was an admin building, not a central office office switching center. Even then, there’s a huge amount of utility work.

      Delete
  8. Hmmm. A quick web search (https://tinyurl.com/yc7kbssr) for "indiana bell building moved 1930" proves that swalloping your cod should probably be done in private.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I keep coming back to 'why'? It was stated that there was a need for more office space, but the building's footprint remained the same. Draw new plans for your extra office space - it would be cheaper, faster and easier. But then we would not have this particular post.

    ReplyDelete