And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Indeed. Certainly is a good one, getting better at disguising the AI artifacts which give it away. Got to say, they know how to create very desirable looking pseudo ladies.
I think the "They don't really know" comment may be accurate. You can set the camera up to have the haze / glow / out of focus appearance. Old school. Her beauty would make me think AI however.... remarkable.
Anybody who did film photography before digital got high enough resolution to do portraits knows how to blur the background. Manipulating depth of field is Photography 101.
The easy test is to do a Google reverse image search. If it doesn't almost immediately pull up a name, then it's an A.I. creation. Models want to get paid, and models get paid by making sure they have name recognition.
Millions of photos on the internet that are not of models and not all good looking ladies are models. Also, this one is at least seven years old buy a image search so it isn't AI.
The controversy of whether a picture ie real or AI is quite interesting. When one is attracted to a particular real person doesn’t our mind view that person with perfection regardless of any flaws? Our perception is in reality, artificial. Whether the image of this person is real or not, in my mind she is extremely attractive and would fulfill many of my fondest dreams.
Notice the fine strands of hair which are also somewhat out of focus. I could do that with my old Rolleflex with a very fine grain emulsion film. Ah those were the days. Shows my age too.
I look for little giveaways, the big one is when you expand the shot, particularly the face, has a distinct but subtle surrealistic appearance, missing aspects of the female neck structure, if there are hands in the photo, they give it away big time, for some reason AI has difficulty creating accurate hand features, another way is looking at the edges of the hairdo, at the ends, they look faked compared to living female hair features. But the face is the larger tell, its a whole effect, woman do not look like that so perfect it makes your loins quiver. It is AI messing with the Male mind. Gives me the creeps. It is creepy, one cause its sneaky, two cause its not real but its designed to pull you in and desire. Something not right with a so called AI, they ain't, its complex logarithms. Who likes being gulled and played for a fucking sucker, huh? I certainly do not.
If you enlarge the image you can tell that is caused by the shadow from her hair on the left side of her face. Not every picture is an AI generated one.
yom yom
ReplyDeleteYet another AI masterpiece.
ReplyDeleteIndeed. Certainly is a good one, getting better at disguising the AI artifacts which give it away. Got to say, they know how to create very desirable looking pseudo ladies.
DeleteHow do you know this is AI? Help me to understand. What am I looking for in terms of tell-tale signs or artifacts?
DeleteThey don't really know. It just makes them feel smart to claim to detect AI.
DeleteThe very-out-of-focus background is seen in a lot of AI pics.
DeleteMy camera from the 90s does the out of focus background effect, that means nothing
DeleteI think the "They don't really know" comment may be accurate. You can set the camera up to have the haze / glow / out of focus appearance. Old school. Her beauty would make me think AI however.... remarkable.
DeleteDoctor Weasel clearly knows nothing about photography and depth of field in particular.
DeleteAnybody who did film photography before digital got high enough resolution to do portraits knows how to blur the background. Manipulating depth of field is Photography 101.
DeleteIf you do a reverse image search you can find copies that are at least seven years old, so, no, it isn't AI.
Delete"The very-out-of-focus background is seen in a lot of AI pics."
DeleteNo. The blurry background is common in portrait photography and can be easily done with a short telephoto and open aperture on the lens.
You AI weenies are becoming quite boring.
IMHO those A.I. weenies are taking a wild azzed guess hoping that someone agrees with them.
DeletePretty girl.
ReplyDeleteTis surely a bonnie lass.
ReplyDeleteWould, if she wasn’t AI. Come on now!
ReplyDeleteI think we see a lot of AI redheads because the demand exceeds the supply of real ones
ReplyDeleteThe easy test is to do a Google reverse image search. If it doesn't almost immediately pull up a name, then it's an A.I. creation. Models want to get paid, and models get paid by making sure they have name recognition.
ReplyDeleteThere are way more beautiful women that aren’t models than are…
DeleteMillions of photos on the internet that are not of models and not all good looking ladies are models. Also, this one is at least seven years old buy a image search so it isn't AI.
DeleteThe controversy of whether a picture ie real or AI is quite interesting. When one is attracted to a particular real person doesn’t our mind view that person with perfection regardless of any flaws? Our perception is in reality, artificial. Whether the image of this person is real or not, in my mind she is extremely attractive and would fulfill many of my fondest dreams.
ReplyDeletePhwoar
ReplyDeleteOh! My Gawd!!!
ReplyDeleteI'd give a lot to be able to kiss each and every one of those freckles... all the way down to her bellybutton.
DeleteShe's got those puffed-up lips that you don't like.
DeleteThat OK now?
Annie 3:44 - I think you may be confused with "enhanced" fish lips that she certainly does not have.
DeleteHer hat is on backwards...
ReplyDeleteNotice the fine strands of hair which are also somewhat out of focus. I could do that with my old Rolleflex with a very fine grain emulsion film. Ah those were the days. Shows my age too.
ReplyDeleteI look for little giveaways, the big one is when you expand the shot, particularly the face, has a distinct but subtle surrealistic appearance, missing aspects of the female neck structure, if there are hands in the photo, they give it away big time, for some reason AI has difficulty creating accurate hand features, another way is looking at the edges of the hairdo, at the ends, they look faked compared to living female hair features. But the face is the larger tell, its a whole effect, woman do not look like that so perfect it makes your loins quiver. It is AI messing with the Male mind. Gives me the creeps. It is creepy, one cause its sneaky, two cause its not real but its designed to pull you in and desire. Something not right with a so called AI, they ain't, its complex logarithms. Who likes being gulled and played for a fucking sucker, huh? I certainly do not.
ReplyDeleteAI is getting good. Check out Tilley Norwood.
ReplyDeleteSeven years old? Hell she may be pushin 250 by now. AI
ReplyDeleteThe colored part of her left eye is much bigger the her right.
ReplyDeleteIf you enlarge the image you can tell that is caused by the shadow from her hair on the left side of her face. Not every picture is an AI generated one.
DeleteYummy!
ReplyDelete