Make no mistake, Hillary and the progressives are well aware of where this symbolism comes from, and they happily embrace it. The same cannot be said for the embarrassing LIV's who idolize her.
Although they call themselves Democrats, or more often now, Progressives, that's just another version of totalitarian. They yearn to control every detail of your actions and thought, and claim as much of your wealth as they can. Does anyone believe, knowing Hillary as we do, that if she could get away with it, she would lock up or otherwise destroy anyone who opposed her?
Our motto should be:
No more Clintons, ever again.
Mao would be pleased that he and his ideology has penetrated so deeply into the American political body. Given that Mao happily murdered millions and millions of his own people in his quest for ultimate power, one must wonder why Hillary and the progressives have such a warm spot in their political hearts for he and his ilk.
Why would any awake American take a chance on a vote for her, or indeed any progressive, given this?
Via Weasel Zippers.
Related and relevant: Hillary Clinton argues "we have to reign in American's support for Second Amendment rights." Reign in those pesky Constitutional rights! Now she is even sounding like Mao, who did disarm his subjects, just before he began murdering them.
Hillary is also using a younger "Evita" face in that picture.
ReplyDeletehttp://media.thefashionscope.com/2012/08/Eva-Peron-Fascination.jpg
Uh, that would be "rein", as in "control," not "reign" as in "rule."
ReplyDeleteUnderstandable, perhaps, given the context, but nonetheless wrong. Let's conserve English for posterity.
Oh yeah, while I'm at it:
ReplyDelete"Its."
Carry on.
Grammer Nazi! Come to think of it, maybe "reign" is more accurate, and perhaps is a freudian slip, when it comes to what Hillary really wants to do.
DeleteWhat can I tell ya, I like English.
DeleteOh yeah...that's "grammar."
;-}