From Frontpagemag:
"Newspaper print advertising revenues of just $17.3 billion in 2013 fell to the lowest level of print advertising since the NAA started tracking industry data in 1950. In constant 2013 dollars, advertising revenues last year were $2.7 billion (and 13.5%) below the $20 billion spent in 1950, 62 years ago. Print advertising last year was almost $2 billion below the level of $19.2 billion in 2012, which was the first year that print advertising revenues fell below the 1950 level."
That's a "crash and burn" statistic if there ever was one. Soon, physical newspapers will join the buggy whip manufactures in the dust bin of history.
The local rag here in Sacramento is admittedly better than it used to be in the amount of rank political bias it tries to sell, but it is still, by and large, a propaganda organ for the dominant political party.
My wife likes the routine of reading a paper with her coffee every morning, so we still subscribe, but I last read one over a decade ago. As soon as I found the internet, I realized I could get my news at least a day earlier and without the bias my local bleat tries to push. That's not to say the internet is always accurate, or without bias, but there they are at least up front about where they are coming from, and the better sites are quick to correct any errors.
The future is electronic, and up front about the world view they are coming from. It will be better for everyone when that transformation is complete.
I think I like that I can read with the bias that fits me, that's why its the internet or nothing.........
ReplyDelete