Thursday, August 18, 2016

My next read

Donald Douglas was just now recommending this over at American Power.  Larry, we should both read this, I would be quite interested in your take on it., especially since if we get a Hillary administration, the retreat aspect will likely go on for years.

Mr. Douglas described it this way:

I particularly enjoyed Lieber's discussion of Europe, which is found in chapter 2, "Burden sharing with Europe: problems of capability and will." Lieber has a comparativist's grasp of the internal politics of the leading European nation-states, and his analysis of Germany's role, and Germany's realpolitik within the E.U., is both perceptive and troubling. Berlin advances a very hard-line against weaker E.U. members, like Greece, while at the same time pushing utopian schemes like Merkel's refugee policy, that end up forcing a second blow against the peripheral states, poorer regimes that must bear the extreme costs of the central E.U.'s "enlightened humanitarianism."

The chapters on Middle East politics and the BRICS are also excellent, especially the latter's discussion of BRIC free-riding off America's hegemonic leadership in power politics and international institutions. You'll find yourself infuriated at times as you plow through this chapter, especially because current U.S. leadership --- folks so committed to their own idealistic policies, like the Obama administration's climate change agenda --- is getting thrown under the bus of the world system's multilateral collective action problem.

It's a stunning eye-opener for those worried about the direction of U.S. foreign policy and America's continued primacy.

Retreat and its Consequences: American Foreign Policy and the Problem of World Order


  1. I'm reading: "Those Angry Days" by: Lynne Olson. It brilliant depicts in detail the American political dominated era from the early 1930's up to WW-II and the fight between the Isolationists (Lindbergh) & the Pro-Aid to Britain (Roosevelt). Lots of stuff that parallels todays struggle between National interests and globalism.

    1. I keep telling my kids that although times change, people don't, and thus you can learn an enormous amount from history.

  2. I've spoken with Donald Douglas a couple of times. He lives in the LA Area and our paths have crossed. He's a bright guy.

    I find the cause and effect of American hegemony and the distracted "fundamental transformation of America" that Obama's distorted perceptions have tried to accomplish in our Great March, headed by Obama, himself, to have predictable results.

    The Utopian "world order" as envisioned by the internationalists has run headlong into nationalism (BREXIT, Trump, and similar movements across Europe), and we don't know where it will end up, but we have a multi-polar world now. What used to be the US and Soviet Russia is many centers of power, with influence ebbing and flowing. Barack doesn't get it and neither does Hillary because they are myopic narcissists. To be fair, Trump doesn't get it yet, but I think that his advisors have a grasp and that's what matters for the moment.