Thursday, August 29, 2013

Now, even Democratic congressmen are pointing out the obvious.

To a supposed scholar on constitutional law.


Democratic congressman Jerrold Nadler appears to be warning President Obama in a statement released today on striking Syria. "Constitution Requires Congressional Authorization on Use of Force Against Syria," reads the title of Nadler's statement.
The text of the statement reads:
The Constitution requires that, barring an attack on the United States or an imminent threat to the U.S., any decision to use military force can only be made by Congress -- not by the President.  The decision to go to war -- and we should be clear, launching a military strike on another country, justified or not, is an act of war -- is reserved by the Constitution to the American people acting through their elected representatives in Congress. 
Since there is no imminent threat to the United States, there is no legal justification for bypassing the Constitutionally-required Congressional authorization. “Consultation” with Congress is not sufficient. The Constitution requires Congressional authorization.
The American people deserve to have this decision debated and made in the open, with all the facts and arguments laid out for public review and debate, followed by a Congressional vote. If the President believes that military action against Syria is necessary, he should immediately call Congress back into session and seek the Constitutionally-required authorization.

5 comments:

  1. The Democrats are using the "radical code word" Constitution now? What is the country coming to?

    ReplyDelete
  2. A democrat that has cojones? Standing up to or disagreeing with the prez could have dire consequences for him. He should put his affairs in order.................

    ReplyDelete
  3. Seems to me that FDR, Truman, JFK & LBJ had major cojones.
    We soon forget that the Dems have not always been pussies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Dems of those years were very different than what we have now. First and foremost, they were patriots, and stood for the rule of law (generally) and the economic growth of the country.

      Now, it's all about wealth redistribution and the weakening of the US in all spheres of influence. I've never seen a party change so completely in so few short years.

      Delete
  4. Does anyone really think that Obama cares? He is going to trash this nation, no matter what the cost. Nadler is too much of a Progressive - something stinks here.

    ReplyDelete